A new look at the MVP:

[Ehsanuls55]

In many discussions about MVPs, you might come across a common image. You'll find this image or something similar:


To clarify, this representation of an MVP typically shows a gradual progression from a basic version to a more advanced one, which makes sense.

Example

Let's take the example of the image

Suppose your vision is to create a fantastic car

You wouldn't start with just one wheel, because that doesn't align with your vision.

But a skateboard? That's a start.

Then you add a handle, bigger wheels, pedals, and finally a motor. This means you are evolving your vp facility manager email list product towards your vision, but from the start, it is still a means of mobility.

However, we have some reservations about this model.

It implies that an MVP involves a significant jump from a scooter to a car, which makes no sense! If anything, you should be showing a progression from a scooter to a motorcycle, which is a different mode of transportation.

If the ultimate goal was to create a car, you would start with a pedal car, then move on to a go-kart, and so on.

The point is that MVP is not about delivering something non-functional or changing your vision along the way; it's about delivering the minimum functionality required.

What are the criteria for testing your MVP?
There are plenty of well-connected people in the startup world who will tell you how to measure your MVP.

In our humble opinion, the best definition is that while your MVP should align with your vision, you should be ashamed of it.

If you're not embarrassed by it, you've launched too late. Let's say you already have a legal or privacy policy page, an incredibly beautiful design in your MVP, etc.; that means you've launched too late .