The whole case is grotesque. On the one hand, a faceless accuser, on the other, a prominent defendant who is giving lots of interviews. In return, the latter steadfastly refuses to face an expert. has to do this, and thanks to the 150-page psychiatric assessment, we were able to learn an incredible amount of intimate information about her. And that brings us to the role of the media.
Here, too, something extraordinary is happening. It is not just the incredible publicity that the Kachelmann case has received. Nor are the explosive details that this story provides thanks thailand rcs data to the long-term, non-stop activities of the main actor. It is the new, previously unfamiliar role that the media is taking on. Because they are not just researching and reporting, they are now clearly taking sides. It is noteworthy that the more serious press, from Spiegel to Die Zeit , has clearly sided with Kachelmann, relying primarily on the Greuel report, which was only selectively passed on to them by the defense and which puts the plaintiff in an extremely bad light. In Switzerland, Weltwoche has also jumped on this bandwagon.
It seems as if these papers wanted to secure the legitimacy to report in detail on this juicy, high-circulation tabloid story by clearly taking a position. On the other side are the actual tabloid media such as Bunte and Focus.who let off steam without needing such moral legitimation and who, in doing so, allow themselves to be served above all by the gang of former lovers and the public prosecutor. And so the press has expanded its role in a dangerous way: it has not only informed, no, it has taken a clear position.