There are fewer and fewer people who want to read his free paper - since the introduction of the new survey method by the Wemf, the Mach Basic 2013-2 to the Mach Basic 2016-1, his "Magazine" has lost 94,000 readers in absolute numbers (13.74 percent). The "Basler Zeitung" has lost only 9,000 readers (7.32 percent) in the same period and the Weltwoche 7,000 readers (2.78 percent).
A meaningful development of the exclusive rcs data malaysia print readership can only be seen in a three-year comparison, the first time based on the new 2013-2016 survey method from Wemf - and, hopefully, is also recorded in this way by media journalists. Half-yearly snapshots of print readership numbers are just as right and wrong as the respective voting forecasts by the storyteller Longchamp, who is disguised as a bow tie and who finances his dice games with our license fee money.
Instead of celebrating the inquisition of printed newspapers every six months, the Wemf should finally use the publishers' money to invest in total audience studies so that at least one simultaneous publication of the transformation process from print to digital readers is guaranteed. Then even the slow thinkers would notice more quickly that almost all media brands, whether newspapers or magazines, have not lost any readers/users/users - or whatever other terms are floating around - in total, at least not free users.