Page 1 of 1

SEO International Market

Posted: Sun Jan 12, 2025 4:21 am
by monira#$1244
According to Google CEO Eric Schmidt, in 2010, Google made more than 500 algorithm changes—almost 1.5 per day. It is considered a smart business practice for website operators to move away from reliance on search engine traffic. In addition to crawler accessibility (described above), user web accessibility is becoming increasingly important to SEO.

Optimization techniques are highly coordinated with the dominant search engines in the target market. The market share of search engines varies from market to market, and so does the competition.

In 2003, Danny Sullivan stated that Google accounted for around 75% of all searches. In markets outside the United States, Google's share tends to be larger, and as of 2007, Google is still the dominant search engine worldwide. As of 2006, Google's market share in Germany was 85-90%. At the time, there were hundreds of SEO companies in the United States, but only about 5 in Germany. According to Hitwise, as of June 2008, Google's market share in the United Kingdom was close to 90%. This market share is achieved in many countries. You can further understand the data of global search engine share as of August 2024 .

As of 2009, there are only a few large markets where Google is not the albania whatsapp data leading search engine. In most cases, when Google is not leading in a particular market, it lags behind local players. The most notable example markets are China, Japan, South Korea, Russia, and the Czech Republic, where Baidu, Yahoo Japan, Naver, Yandex, and Seznam are the market leaders, respectively.

Successful international search optimization may require professional translation of your web pages, registration of top-level domains in your target markets, and web hosting with local IP addresses. Other than that, the basic elements of search optimization are largely the same regardless of the language.

SEO Legal Precedents
On October 17, 2002, SearchKing sued the search engine Google in the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma. SearchKing claimed that Google's strategy to prevent spam indexing constituted a tortious interference with the contractual relationship. On May 27, 2003, the court granted Google's motion to dismiss the lawsuit because SearchKing "failed to state a claim for relief."

In March 2006, KinderStart sued Google over search engine rankings. Before the lawsuit, KinderStart's website was removed from Google's index, and its website traffic dropped by 70%. On March 16, 2007, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California (San Jose Branch) dismissed KinderStart's complaint, did not allow it to be amended, and partially approved Google's Section 11 sanctions motion against KinderStart's lawyers, requiring them to pay part of Google's legal fees.