Wearable Device : Useful for pairing and setting up Samsung wearable devices
Posted: Wed Feb 12, 2025 4:45 am
While I like the fact that the Galaxy A35 comes with the latest versions of Android and OneUI available, I am quite unhappy with the amount of extra apps that come pre-installed. It's too much bloatware, no matter how you look at it.
Performance in tests
To evaluate the performance of the Samsung Galaxy A35, I ran a series of tests to see how it handles multitasking and gaming, as well as how it handles everyday tasks. Additionally, I also compared its performance portugal telegram data to last year’s Samsung Galaxy A54, which uses the same Exynos 1380 chipset, and the more expensive mid-range Galaxy A55, which is equipped with the newer Exynos 1480 chipset. Here are my findings:
In Geekbench 6, the Samsung Galaxy A35 delivers comparable performance to the older Galaxy A54 in all tests, with the differences being within a negligible margin of error. These differences are unlikely to be noticeable in normal, day-to-day use. However, the Galaxy A35’s results in the multi-core and Vulkan GPU tests are noticeably behind the Galaxy A55’s.
Performance in tests
To evaluate the performance of the Samsung Galaxy A35, I ran a series of tests to see how it handles multitasking and gaming, as well as how it handles everyday tasks. Additionally, I also compared its performance portugal telegram data to last year’s Samsung Galaxy A54, which uses the same Exynos 1380 chipset, and the more expensive mid-range Galaxy A55, which is equipped with the newer Exynos 1480 chipset. Here are my findings:
In Geekbench 6, the Samsung Galaxy A35 delivers comparable performance to the older Galaxy A54 in all tests, with the differences being within a negligible margin of error. These differences are unlikely to be noticeable in normal, day-to-day use. However, the Galaxy A35’s results in the multi-core and Vulkan GPU tests are noticeably behind the Galaxy A55’s.