Real Data

The second term is "comment function". still the position of "letters to the editor editor", admittedly mostly as a pension, who would sift through the letters received, throw anonymous ones straight into the wastepaper basket, sort out anything that was poorly written or written, and also ensure that the letters to the editor page did not turn poland rcs data into a cesspool whose unpleasant stench wafted over to the rest of the media outlet, nowadays anyone who is able to open a free email account under a pseudonym can use the multiplier platform that the digital presence of most press outlets provides them with almost no inhibitions and for free.

At most, a certain filter is commercially available, usually outsourced, where a few students earn extra money by throwing out legally tricky, sick things and things that violate broad, very broad rules of decency. Usually supported by simple algorithms that react to expressions like "asshole", "Jewish pig", "stupid black woman", "fascist" and the like. This is part of the reader-paper bond, and often also part of "contribution to public opinion formation". But what else can you expect from media outlets that are still unable to give a convincing answer to the simple question: How can you want to sell something in print that you offer for free on the Internet? Except perhaps: Well, then let's make print free too.