Harassers can create an account themselves to attack you,

[shishir.seoexpert1]

Remember, he's the one who covered the Arab Spring from the United States via Twitter. His point, at ONA 2019 , was to get us out of paranoia without lowering our vigilance. “Yes, bots are used to disinform and harass, but human beings are not short of imagination to do this work themselves. Don’t see bots everywhere. It’s not because a Twitter account, for example, has only two or three followers and follows almost no one that it is a bot.


Ask all their friends to do the same. You gambling data qatar don’t need technology for that.” OK, but how do we do it? Carvin created a nomenclature. A list of criteria, none of which is sufficient to identify an account as a bot. 1 High level of activity "Of course, it's a clue. If you tweet and retweet 70 times a day, the account is suspicious. But be careful!" Andy Carvin shows us an account whose photo and ID he has blurred.



The activity indicates 120 tweets. Riddle: "Bot or not bot"? We say bot. "No, it's my own account! My job sometimes leads me to a tweeting frenzy. This is also the case for many journalists or activists, for example." 2 Anonymity The researcher shows us anonymous accounts. No photos, identifiers in the form of long series of numbers and letters. "Bot or not bot?" Some are, others are not. Some are masters in the art of hiding while expressing themselves, for better or worse.